The R.S.V.P Puzzle


In the ancient world (or perhaps I should say, in the 1960s) everyone knew what R.S.V.P. meant. Today, not so much. Oh, people do think they know. But, you can be dead sure and dead wrong.

Consider today’s essay a short lesson in good taste and good manners. It might make people like you more.

An example will illustrate the point. I had the occasion to invite several people to a dinner for an organization with which I am involved. It is a not-for-profit corporation. These particular invitees had been helpful to the enterprise, but we didn’t know all of them well. The invitations requested them to R.S.V.P. It was clear that the dinner would be free to each one, a material way to thank them for their good-will and assistance.

Fourteen of these invitations were sent, but only three responses were received as the date approached. About two weeks before the event emails were sent with a second request to R.S.V.P. This brought additional answers to the question of whether we should expect their attendance or not.

Out of the blue came two emails from people who had not been invited, telling us that they would be coming. Whoa! How did this happen?

It turned out that these were associates of two of the real invitees. The newcomers were individuals whom we had never met and had not been involved with our not-for-profit corporation. They’d been given the invitations and encouraged to attend our event. Indeed, they were temporary employees in those organizations that had been helpful to us.

This put us in the awkward position of having to tell these people that they had not been invited (as they already knew); and, since we are a charity, to inform them that we had a limited capacity to provide complimentary dinners that would diminish the funds available for our philanthropic efforts.

The attempt to pass along our invitation reminded me of a practice that has occurred in wartime. During the Civil War, for example, you could get out of serving as a soldier if you could find someone willing to substitute for you. Still, this was hardly the Civil War, but a simple dinner invitation done in gratitude for the help provided to us. No bullets would be flying.

So what happened? Why did we receive responses from less than 2/3 of those to whom we wished to show some kindness and gratitude? And why did two of those people think it would be appropriate to pass along our invitation to others we did not know without asking us if this was permissible?

First, I don’t think anyone intentionally wanted to be rude. These are all good and decent folks. They do good work at their places of employment. They had no motive to be disrespectful and I’m sure had no intention of being thoughtless.

What other explanation might then account for the failure to respond? I suspect that R.S.V.P has somehow lost a bit of its meaning, the compulsory quality it used to carry. So what exactly does it mean to R.S.V.P. and what did it mean once upon a time?

Let’s start with the literal meaning. It is an abbreviation of a common French phrase whose translation is, “Please respond.”

According to Wikipedia:

The high society of England adopted French etiquette in the late 18th century, and the writings of Emily Post (the authority on etiquette) aim to offer a standard no more stringent than that tradition. Late 20th century editions (of her book), building on her 1920s beginning work, say… that “Anyone receiving an invitation with an RSVP on it is obliged to reply….” and some recent editions describe breaching this standard as “inexcusably rude.”

Emily Post advises (that) anyone receiving an invitation with an R.S.V.P. on it must reply promptly, and should reply within a day or two of receiving the invitation.

OK, so when you receive a written invitation to an event, it is expected that you will quickly inform your host whether or not you plan to attend. That puts some pressure on you: if you are coming you need to so inform the sender; equally, if you are not coming, your anticipated non-attendance must also be reported.


  1. First, because someone has thought of you favorably. He or she wishes the pleasure of your company. It may be your brilliance, your beauty, your fame, your charm, or something else, but the invitation says that you matter. By responding you acknowledge the kindness and compliment being extended to you and take a small step in reciprocating. In effect, you are saying, “Thank you for the invitation. You matter to me, too.”
  2. Invitations generally do not go to everyone. Space is often limited. If the host or hostess is to be able to plan to fill those spaces, he or she needs to know who will be there and who won’t.
  3. Social gatherings generally involve food and refreshments. The party planner must have a reasonable idea of how much to buy, how much to prepare, how much to budget. And, they must have enough advanced notice to do this.
  4. You were invited. Not your understudy, not your next-door-neighbor, not your business associate. Don’t assume that anyone else can substitute for you. That diminishes the importance of the thoughtfulness of the host or hostess in choosing you.

I suspect that many of us don’t think about these things too much; don’t think about the reasons our potential benefactor needs to hear from us, sooner rather than later or not at all. Some assume that they need to respond only with regrets at not being able to come. And, indeed, many invitations come with the message “Regrets only.”

I imagine that when some of us delay responding or don’t respond at all, we are thinking, “Oh, one person more or less isn’t going to matter that much;” or “I’ll get to it later.” No harm is intended by this attitude, yet there can be inconvenience or expense to the person extending the invitation. Remember, that person has to answer the question “Should I buy enough chicken for a dinner of 15 or 115?”

I also have witnessed, as have all of us over 40, that the civilized world has become a more casual place, one with fewer dress codes, social restrictions, and compulsory expectations. A world that is a bit friendlier and more at ease. But, sometimes that ease is purchased at the price of slackness, inconsideration, and unreliability. I can’t tell you what the perfect balance is, but I can tell you that if you are planning an event, you hope that people take your invitations seriously and make your life a little easier by informing you of their plans with respect to it.

Immanuel Kant, the great German philosopher, offered us a way to think about situations like this. He wrote about the idea of a “categorical imperative” when it comes to rules for moral behavior. He suggested that each of us should ask ourselves some version of the following question: Would I be content if the rules I use to govern my behavior (like viewing an R.S.V.P as optional) also apply to everyone else in the world? And, would the world be better or worse for it?

Really, it is pretty simple. The Golden Rule is almost always a great way to evaluate our conduct. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Even in response to dinner invitations.

8 thoughts on “The R.S.V.P Puzzle

  1. Does this also apply to Facebook invitations to events?

    I must admit that I’m guilty of not responding to these invites.


    • drgeraldstein

      Since I am not a user of social media like Facebook, I really don’t know what rules of etiquette apply to that. If you find out, I’d love to know. Is an RSVP specified? In addition to that, I suspect what is crucial is that the invitation isn’t simply something sent to all of one’s 500 Facebook friends, but an event where someone is making special preparations involving time and money for a select group; and that the amount of time and money depends on how many people come. If you follow the guidance of Kant, you probably won’t go very far wrong.


  2. Steven Kuptsis

    Yikes — I feel a bit out of the know, perhaps because I’ve never been invited anywhere because of my good looks. That being said, I have taken a very unscientific poll of those within shouting distance and their consensus was that the obligation to RSVP was if you were definitely intending to come, not necessarily if you were passing. Since many invites come with “RSVP by …” the assumption was that if you didn’t make the date, you weren’t coming, and that got applied to all situations. Maybe there should always be a date? If not, it appears that no one should invite anyone at my workplace anywhere. Not a bad policy, come to think …


  3. drgeraldstein

    I always enjoy your sense of humor, Steven! I think you have underlined one of the points my essay tried to make. That there has been a change of understanding about the meaning of the request “RSVP.” For those raised on the “Emily Post” version of that understanding, a response is expected regardless of whether it is yes or no. For others, perhaps not. But, given the confusion about what exactly this means to people, I’d say the following. The person sending the invitation now needs to clarify exactly what is expected and hope the potential guest will read it and comply. Similarly, the invitee should respond yes or no unless they are absolutely certain that the host has the same expectation as he (the invitee does) with regard to those conditions that don’t require a reply. Moreover, self-addressed, stamped envelopes usually come with a snail-mail invitation; and email is easily replied to. It is so easy to reply, that I’d say, when in doubt, do reply. And, imagine yourself in the situation of the host, who has to go to more trouble to figure out who is coming to the party, given the current confusion.


  4. I am giving you a standing ovation! I’ve lamented the loss of general good manners for years. I am not talking about where an oyster fork should be placed, but simple pleasantries as saying, “Excuse me” when you cross in front of someone in the grocery store aisle.

    My way of venting is to say out loud, “Big world. Not the only one in it.” But I am 50, and my spunkiness increased with the loss of my testosterone levels. 🙂

    Steven’s informal poll at his office was so eye-opening. I never thought that’s how someone would perceive RSVP. But, of course, I was taught to address my elders as Mr. and Mrs., and to always use “the magic word,” as my Mother called it — “please.”


  5. drgeraldstein

    Standing ovations are always in short supply, Harrry, so thank you! I’d comment on your comment, but you’ve said it perfectly.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s